When left wing degenerates, sexual deviants, autogynephiliacs and child molesters use and objectify Islamic/Mexican/Black minorities, they are using them as moral sockpuppets for dismissing criticisms of their own twisted and perverse ideologies. The tired “right side of history” argument is an overplayed card in the book of establishing control over high schoolers and equally naive CHILDREN – most of whom they are trying to groom and molest. Leftists will toss around phrases like “Uncle Tom” like it is their birthright. “Oh that black politician/individual is ‘catering’ to conservative talking points – what a house nigger. Do a dance for me, porch monkey”. If the hypocrisy there is going over your head, you are already too far gone. If there was actually any concern for these voices, libshits wouldn’t lose their minds the moment a minority steps off the ideological plantation and rejects “traditionally white” progressive dogma. Maybe the democratic party never actually changed – because besides your Richard Spencer-types, conservatives are much quicker to treat blacks like people. Progressives are perfectly comfortable using racial epithets like “house nigger” to describe their political opponents – not because “the democrats are the real racists” (HONK HONK) but because minorities are used as furniture in their ideological showroom. When confronted by dissent, they don’t engage – they diagnose. They do not listen; they label. The left sees bigotry as the easiest way to shut down speech; to question them is to blaspheme, to disagree is to forfeit your humanity. Alternatively, they’ll use the argument that you are a “fake minority”; pointing out your wealth, education or immediate ancestors. In the same way that George Zimmerman is a “cracker” and an “oppressor”, as labelled by the Hispanic communities themselves, Nick Fuentes and Milo Yiannopoulos aren’t Hispanics and kikes respectively. “I don’t want the government involved in censorship but misgendering trans people should be a crime”. Suppressing speech will always be a messy subject – similar to the paradox of tolerance, but simply defending speech is not always an agreement of stance. Forcing someone into silence is not the same as them choosing to hide, but it’s certainly not defamation. Choosing to be silent is no one’s fault but your own. There is a marketplace of ideas and if you’re desperate to silence others, it means you are afraid of what those legitimate ideas show. Clamping down on speech in spaces where you feel small and weak next to alpha male ideologies and logical arguments, free of strawmen to sling slurs at, is trying to game the system. You support communism, islamicism, and interventionism for the same reasons Obama orders $65K worth of cheese pizza to the White House, you like raping children. In the same way an r9k incel sees traditionalism and thinks a return to it would get him laid, you see Sharia Law and start to drool thinking about all those little boys. You hear about the “down under” and wish you were born black. You hear about Hollywood and wish you a child star. You heard about Michelle Obama and wished you passed “that well”. This perverse iconoclast is here for little boys and girls. If you truly cared about reevaluating morality, you would be reading more Nietzsche – not watching the Dear White People. Historical significance will never matter. Positions taken, not by logic, but in tribute to Rudyard Kipling, will always fail. Why? Because it isn’t fucking real. It is fairy dust – it doesn’t fucking exist. The next time you see someone parrot one of these talking points, ask yourself “does this person have sugar plum fairies in their head?”. You aren’t the main character in a Hunger Games book, you are a 28 year old man with a MAP flag on your wall. Just because a few innocents get locked up for murder, doesn’t mean we should ditch murder laws entirely – in this same respect, we have to have principles when it comes to free speech. It is not freedom they defend, but performance. Not tolerance, but theatricality. These people see being “fashionable” as better than being right. “Silence him! He’s anti-gay”. I’m not anti-gay. I am pro-“stop being a faggot around me”. Whether or not the traditional household is the norm, it’s what we should project: a nation of good and normal people raising our children to be GOOD and NORMAL. Stop using minorities as a moral soapbox to prop up an ideology of sexual deviancy. Supporting racist speech is not racist – calling the black man that does a “Uncle Tom” IS. Perspective matters. Stop book burnings.